On Ma, 13 mar 12, 14:19:56, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > Thanks for explanation. > Is Debian leaving the old way of maintaining config files in favor of > ucf? As far as I can tell ucf makes sense only in some cases (see the description of the package, it's quite informative). > Maybe dpkg should set this variable when it's called with confmiss > option... it kindof sucks finding out that documented way to > restore config file does not work. You could file a wishlist bug against dpkg. Kind regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature