[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: flashplayer et Linux



Le Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:10:51 +0200,
Eric Degenetais <edegenetais@henix.fr> a écrit :

> J'ai l'impression qu'il s'agit juste d'affichage, le wrapper affiche
> pepper en tant que "Shockwave Flash". Peut-être qu'il affiche le Flash
> d'origine comme Shockwave Flash également...

Sous Jessie : 

about:plugins

Shockwave Flash

    Fichier : libfreshwrapper-flashplayer.so
    Chemin : /usr/lib/browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash/libfreshwrapper-flashplayer.so
    Version : 22.0.0.192
    État : Activé
    Shockwave Flash 22.0 r0

S'il y en a plusieurs, désactiver ou supprimer les indésirables. Si ce
n'est pas le bon, regarder :
update-alternatives --config flash-mozilla.so

S'il existe dans le dossier utilisateur :
~/.mozilla/plugins/flashplayer.so 
le virer.

Par ailleurs : 

pepperflashplugin-nonfree                      

Description : Pepper Flash Player
- browser plugin This package will download Chrome from Google, and
unpack it to make the included Pepper Flash Player available for use
with Chromium.  The end user license agreement is available at Google.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash         

Recommande: pepperflashplugin-nonfree

Description : PPAPI-host NPAPI-plugin adapter for pepperflash The main
goal of the project is to get PPAPI (Chrome) plugins working in Firefox
(and any other web-browser supporting NPAPI plugins). It implements a
wrapper which behaves like browser to PPAPI plugin and implements NPAPI
plugin interface for browser to use. This particular implementation
doesn't implement any sandboxing, which means any malicious code can
break through plugin security as there are no additional barriers.
This is the same level of security as NPAPI Flash have. Flash plugin
for Linux provided by adobe stopped at version 11.2; for
chrome/chromium users there is pepperflash plugin but it's not
supported by firefox/iceweasel/other browsers. 


-- 
haricophile@aranha.fr 


Reply to: