Neil Williams wrote: > > I would consider its popularity low (187 popcon installs with 46 > > votes). > > It's not that low. It looks like quite a few people find it useful, so > that's good. Using absolute popcon numbers as indications of a package's popularity isn't the best idea anyway, since we don't know what percentage of users use popcon. Comparing popcon stats for two packages is more useful. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature