On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 21:48 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > IMHO we really should have a global NMU blacklist (no, never per-package. > That way lies lameness) which we could ask the ctte to place maintainers in > for a few months when someone does the NMU-and-forget routine and that NMU > causes problems: screw up an NMU and don't clean up after yourself, get > punished by not being able to screw up through NMUs again for a while. Is this actually such a big problem that there needs to come a separate infrastructure and procedure for punishment? Or does it only happen occasionally and would contacting those maintainers to tell them the results of their actions suffice? > We should *also* have the pts auto-add anyone who does an NMU to receive all > bug reports. If you NMU, you *are* responsible for it, and it is not nice > to make it so easy for one to forget he NMUed something, after all. That sounds like a good idea; just send copies to the last uploader if that's not in the list of maintainers. That would also automatically stop the mails to you upon the next maintainer upload. Thijs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part