Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy

[bts@alum.mit.edu (Brian T. Sniffen)]

Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr> writes:

> Quoting Jeremy Hankins <nowan@nowan.org>:
>
>> > We don't agree? So what?
>> 
>> Oh, I certainly disagree with you, but that wasn't my point -- others
>> are doing a fine job of making that argument.  But if I did agree with
>> you, can you imagine the flame wars that would result if we had to
>> decide, on a case-by-case basis, whether or not Debian could permit
>> and/or support various invariant screeds?  I have a feeling l.d.o
>> would simply explode!
>
> Hey, non-software-related invariants would be rejected, at least. :-)

But since Debian distributes only software, and Invariants must be
Secondary... actually, isn't the GNU Manifesto non-secondary when
distributed as part of Debian GNU/Whatever?

-Brian

-- 
Brian T. Sniffen                                        bts@alum.mit.edu
                       http://www.evenmere.org/~bts/