Re: A possible GFDL compromise

["Joe Moore" <joemoore@iegrec.org>]

Fedor Zuev said:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, David Starner wrote:
>>Fedor Zuev <fedor@earth.crust.irk.ru> writes
>>> It almost certainly affect the normal use of program  and
>>> will be unacceptable because of this, not because of mere existence
>>> of such code.
>
>>How does ls --hangman bringing up a hangman program affect the
>>normal use of the program more then a large manifesto affect the
>>normal use of the manual?
>
> 	1) It should be compilable with any compiler used for
> compilation of ls.

If this is a reason to reject the invariant --hangman option for ls as
non-free, then this is a reason to reject invariant (untranslatable)
sections of documents as non-free.

--Joe