Re: Legal questions about some GNU Emacs files

[Alex Romosan <romosan@sycorax.lbl.gov>]

Mark Rafn <dagon@dagon.net> writes:

> Sure, but for some of us, _software_ is a very broad category. For
> me, it includes all works which can be encoded as a stream of bits.

wow, what can i say?! everything is software!? an infinite number of
monkeys, at an infinite number of keyboards will eventually define all
that is software... the only problem is some bit streams are more
meaningful than others.

i wouldn't want to live in your world.

--alex--

-- 
| I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active |
|  advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with  |
|  automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion  |
|  and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. |