Re: Final Draft: Interpretive Guideline regarding DFSG clause 3
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 12:02:23AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > I ask you to contribute to Debian's progress, and not to impede it.
> > There simply HAS BEEN NO PROBLEM before. The GFDL is new, but the
> > principles involved are NOT; they are WELL-TRAVELED GROUND, and it is
>
> Sorry, I don't think this is the case. While the FSF may have established
> that they're willing to ignore certain crucial freedoms for data and
> documentation, Debian hasn't done anything similar.
Except that Debian has, in fact, included the Emacs manual since its
very inception, right?
Reply to: