[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gitolite 1.5.4-1: Please translate debconf PO for the package gitolite



Gerfried Fuchs píše v Po 16. 08. 2010 v 12:22 +0200: 
> 	Hi!
> 
> * Michal Simunek <michal.simunek@gmail.com> [2010-08-16 11:49:41 CEST]:
> > Gerfried Fuchs píše v So 14. 08. 2010 v 19:12 +0200:
> > > language        translated     fuzzy     untranslated
> > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > >   de                 7                          
> > >   es                 0           3             4
> > >   fr                 0           2             5
> > >   pt                 0           2             5
> > >   sv                 0           2             5
> > > 
> > > Please send the updated file to me, or submit it as a wishlist bug
> > > against gitolite.
> > 
> > Please find bugreport #589277, there is translation for language cs,
> 
>  That one is unfortunately not complete - I hadn't included it yet in
> the package.
> 
> > and #589249, there is translation for language ru.
> 
>  The translator of that one did already update it in the report, thanks.
> 
> > If it is needed, make new update round.
> 
>  I don't deem a new update round needed, I didn't call before and it was
> explicitly stated that a swift review round is going on so that people
> should hold their horses until the call is sent out - which I did just
> now. Do you really consider it necessary to collect all currently
> submitted translations and do another call just to get the above table
> correct and have the Czech translation listed in there with fuzzy and
> untranslated strings? Would that really be that helpful?

Of course not, but to have templates translated and updated yes.

I wrote "if needed".

So, I must handle it manual and send a new bugreport with new version of
cs.po?

> 
>  Thanks for the information though, I didn't miss them, I do collect
> them into the package after the waiting time is over though.
> 
>  Enjoy!
> Rhonda

-- 
Michal Šimůnek



Reply to: