Re: isdnutils

[Andreas Metzler <ametzler@logic.univie.ac.at>]

On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 01:48:25PM +0200, MaD dUCK wrote:
> i am pulling up a 486-33 as an isdn router. it's only got 8Mb RAM and
> 240MB HDD, so definitely not a candidate for X. it's not supposed to
> be anyway.
> 
> however, the isdnutils/stable package depends on xfree86-common and
> xlib6g, which i assume is because of X utilities for ISDN. this is the
> case in potato and woody, i don't know about unstable.
> 
> i would assume that these components should be split, isdnctrl et al.
> into isdnutils, and all X clients into xisdnutils. should i just
> submit a bug report? has this been discussed before? what do you
> think?

It has happened already:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/utils/isdnutils.html
            cu andreas