isdnutils
hey all,
i am pulling up a 486-33 as an isdn router. it's only got 8Mb RAM and
240MB HDD, so definitely not a candidate for X. it's not supposed to
be anyway.
however, the isdnutils/stable package depends on xfree86-common and
xlib6g, which i assume is because of X utilities for ISDN. this is the
case in potato and woody, i don't know about unstable.
i would assume that these components should be split, isdnctrl et al.
into isdnutils, and all X clients into xisdnutils. should i just
submit a bug report? has this been discussed before? what do you
think?
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck
--
your fly might be open (but don't check it just now).
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: isdnutils
- From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@logic.univie.ac.at>