On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 11:18:36PM +0200, Fab Stz wrote: > I was also wondering if M-A:foreign was actually needed in that case. > > So the only alternative I have is either to remove the line, or set it to no. > Is there any best/prefered practice? Just remove the line, I would say. It is equivalent to setting M-A:no explicitly from a technical standpoint, but the later implies for other contributors that there is a hard/complicated reason that this package can not be marked with another M-A value currently. Best regards David Kalnischkies
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature