On Fri, 2022-08-12 at 23:35 -0500, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > -O2 is baked into the Makefile. The last option should win so -O0 takes > precedence, I suppose? I can probably convince upstream to implement a > simple ./configure. Sounds right, so probably not an issue, just seemed a bit weird. > Likely, assuming things continue to work. I'll look into that. I don't know what happens when someone uses BSD make instead, that is unlikely on Linux distros but you never know :) > Right. The Debian patch is actually to disable sanitization -- upstream > enabled it for testing only in 1.3.1 which broke CI builds. Current > hypothesis is because eatmydata changes some LD_PRELOAD settings. The patch headers made it sound like you might enable it globally. eatmydata definitely sounds like it would cause this issue. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part