Bug#1010266: RFS: base16384/2.2.0-3 [ITP] -- Encode binary files to printable utf16be

To: 1010266@bugs.debian.org, fumiama@foxmail.com
Subject: Bug#1010266: RFS: base16384/2.2.0-3 [ITP] -- Encode binary files to printable utf16be
From: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 14:37:12 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 2d84107d-1ef6-c936-07a3-06649159e203@debian.org>
Reply-to: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>, 1010266@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 165106093873.21.3042015866819975948.reportbug@sakura.localdomain>
References: <[🔎] 165106093873.21.3042015866819975948.reportbug@sakura.localdomain> <[🔎] 165106093873.21.3042015866819975948.reportbug@sakura.localdomain> <[🔎] 165106093873.21.3042015866819975948.reportbug@sakura.localdomain>

Control: tags -1 moreinfo

On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:02:18 +0800 fumiama <fumiama@foxmail.com> wrote:

Changes for the initial release:

 base16384 (2.2.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix some issues in packaging. Closes: #1010055 (ITP).


Please always keep the -1 Debian revision until sour package is sponsored.
Also, according to my message, please say "Initial Release. Closes: #1010055 (ITP)." in the changelog.
Report your changes in this RFS bug, not in the changelog.
I am tagging moreinfo. Please untag on providing a new revision.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#1010266: RFS: base16384/2.2.0-3 [ITP] -- Encode binary files to printable utf16be
  - From: "fumiama" <fumiama@foxmail.com>

References:
- Bug#1010266: RFS: base16384/2.2.0-3 [ITP] -- Encode binary files to printable utf16be
  - From: fumiama <fumiama@foxmail.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#1010004: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401
Next by Date: Processed: Re: RFS: base16384/2.2.0-3 [ITP] -- Encode binary files to printable utf16be
Previous by thread: Bug#1010266: RFS: base16384/2.2.0-3 [ITP] -- Encode binary files to printable utf16be
Next by thread: Bug#1010266: RFS: base16384/2.2.0-3 [ITP] -- Encode binary files to printable utf16be
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread