[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1010004: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401



Hi Bastian,

thank you very much. I followed your instructions and uploaded again
both odr-dabmod (Bug#1010004) and odr-dabmux (Bug#1009867). I also
removed the tag "moreinfo" on both bugs (hoping I did it right).

I now have 1 question. When I built these packages, debuild generated
the xxx_amd64.changes files. Why do I have "amd64" in the filename (I
understand it relates to the X86_64 architecture)?
For your information, the source is mainly C++ based and it compiles
properly under arm64 and arm/v7 as well. Should I have ran debuild in a
different manner or is it going to be taken care of by the debian
packaging process later on?

Kind regards.

-- 
Robin ALEXANDER

Le mercredi 27 avril 2022 à 00:58 +0200, Bastian Germann a écrit :
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> 
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:20:06 +0200 Robin ALEXANDER
> <robin.alexander@netplus.ch> wrote:
> > Changes for the initial release:
> > 
> >  odr-dabmod (2.6.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
> >  .
> >    * Initial release. Closes: #1007104
> 
> Please fix the lintian error (JS minified, source missing) by having
> the unminified source in debian/missing-sources.
> When you have uploaded a new revision (not changing the changelog),
> untag moreinfo.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: