[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1



Hello Sean,

Sean Whitton writes:

> Hello Alberto,
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:43:29PM +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote:
>> I have now pushed a new release.
>
> Did someone else upload 0~git20161123-1?
>

No...

>
> If not, you should merge the changelog entries for -1 and -2.  It's just
> confusing to have changlog entries that never made it into the Debian
> archive.
>

Well, it seemed cleaner than modifying an already published history, but
I understand no solution is immune to drawbacks.  I have now pushed the
new, fixed branch.  Please note that you will have to re-synchronise, or
clone the repository again from scratch.

>
> After merging them, be sure to run `dch -r` to update the timestamp.
>

Done.  The timestamp is refreshed.

>
> Also, I think you need to put a tag '0_git20161123' on the upstream
> branch.  That's how gbp generates a tarball.

Done as well: upstream/0_git20161123, as gbp expects.

Thanks!


Reply to: