[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Updated LSB test suites



Stew Benedict writes:
> > without lsb runtime)
> > 
> 
> I guess where I perhaps have overlooked something is what defines the
> "lsb" package?  It's mentioned above as well as in the distribution
> certification, but what it consists of is not clear to me.

Assuming the rest of the distribution is compliant it doesn't have to
contain anything at all, just provide the placeholder for the
dependencies. I imagine that distributions may want to make the
installation of the lsb package dependent on a whole lot of bits an
pieces of their distribution that together provide the lsb interfaces.

Chris
-- 
cyeoh@au.ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia



Reply to: