Re: {lsb-test} Re: conformance definitions
Matt Wilson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 07:14:28PM +0000, M. Drew Streib wrote:
> >
> > There has been some contention about exactly how to name these. Can
> > anyone give me a somewhat definitive answer as to what we expect
> > the naming to be? Matt, you gave two examples there. Which one is
> > preferred from your perspective?
>
> Well, my personal preference is to call a space a space and end with
> .rpm. Other people might say that naming it .lsb will make it more
> accepted.
>
> Matt
file:/home/lsb/spec/gLSB/gLSB/pkgnameconv.html
The gLSB spec states that we use a "lsb-" prefix with an implied ".rpm" suffix.
George (gk4)
Reply to: