On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 09:58:32AM -0500, Matt Wilson wrote: > The apache package has an odd format for the filename. It should be > lsb-apache-1.3.22-1.i386.rpm (not lsb-apache_1.3.22-1_i386.rpm). Even > better would be lsb-apache-1.3.22-1.i386.lsb perhaps. There has been some contention about exactly how to name these. Can anyone give me a somewhat definitive answer as to what we expect the naming to be? Matt, you gave two examples there. Which one is preferred from your perspective? -drew -- M. Drew Streib <dtype@dtype.org>, Free Standards Group (freestandards.org) co-founder, SourceForge.net | core team, freedb | sysadmin, Linux Intl. creator, keyanalyze report | maintnr, *.us.pgp.net | other, see freedom/law
Attachment:
pgpoGwigNItDa.pgp
Description: PGP signature