Re: lsb-distribution-test-1.0-1
Thorsten Kukuk writes:
> > statically. Unfortunately this doesn't appear to work properly for
> > getspnam.
>
> Is there any reason that getspnam is not an LSB interface?
> Else, linking this tools static should be no problem, since getspnam
> dlopens the nss modules and libc.
Thats what I would have thought. It ends up segfaulting down in the
dlopen. I need to look at it more closely, it could possibly be a
problem with lsbdev, though AFAIK everything else seems to be ok.
Chris
--
cyeoh@au.ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia
Reply to: