Re: LSB-FHS2.2beta3 update
Candee
Yes. There are a few more of these where I missed putting in
a FAIL=N, prior to the call to tpresult FIP.
I am updating all the affected tests today and a beta4 will
hit the site later today.
regards
Andrew
On Jul 26, 11:43am in "Re: LSB-FHS2.2beta3 ", Candee Sumner wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I also think this test is incorrectly returning the FAIL code instead of
> FIP.
>
> 520|6 1 973 1 1|Reference 5.2.2-1(C)
> 520|6 1 973 1 2|If man pages are supported
> 520|6 1 973 1 3|The /var/cache/man directory exists and is searchable
> 520|6 1 973 1 4|/var/cache/man: directory not found
> 520|6 1 973 1 5|exit code 1 returned, expected 0
> 520|6 1 973 1 6|This test result needs to be manually resolved,
> returning FIP result
> 220|6 1 1 08:49:53|FAIL
Reply to: