Re: vsx-pcts tests for binary test suite

To: Dave Prosser <dfp@sco.com>
Cc: lsb-test@lists.linuxbase.org
Subject: Re: vsx-pcts tests for binary test suite
From: Andrew Josey <ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 06:16:02 +0100
Message-id: <1010522051539.ZM1393@skye.rdg.opengroup.org>
Reply-to: ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org (Andrew Josey)
In-reply-to: Dave Prosser's message as of May 21, 1:10pm.
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105192302070.1010-100000@localhost.localdomain> <1010520071828.ZM17780@skye.rdg.opengroup.org> <3B094C01.E2B25557@sco.com>

There is a POSIX interpretation which said the requirement stands.
If i recall correctly, UnixWare implementated a strategy
that meets both the specification and the security requirement.

On May 21,  1:10pm in "Re: vsx-pcts tests f", Dave Prosser wrote:
>
> I could swear that there's already an interpretation (or the like)
> for that test since we've had the same security fix in UnixWare's
> tmpfile() for years now.  This isn't new.
>

regards
Andrew

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: vsx-pcts tests for binary test suite
  - From: Dave Prosser <dfp@sco.com>

References:
- Re: vsx-pcts tests for binary test suite
  - From: Stuart Anderson <anderson@metrolink.com>
- Re: vsx-pcts tests for binary test suite
  - From: Andrew Josey <ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org>
- Re: vsx-pcts tests for binary test suite
  - From: Dave Prosser <dfp@sco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: vsx-pcts tests for binary test suite
Next by Date: Re: vsx-pcts tests for binary test suite
Previous by thread: Re: vsx-pcts tests for binary test suite
Next by thread: Re: vsx-pcts tests for binary test suite
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread