[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: inetd.d proposal



Previously H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Agreed.  This is another reason for having a post-install script: the
> post-install script could coax the output into the appropriate form for
> your particular flavour of inetd.  Things not supported by your inetd
> such as respawn limits would simply get dropped.

I don't see at all what this has to do with a post-install script..
What we are looking for is something to manage the configuration
of a inetd-like tool such that

* we are not restricted to the features inetd, it should be possible
  to add new features (which may be ignored if your inetd doesn't
  support them)
* allows packages to (un)register themselves
* allows admins to override the configuration as supplied by the package
* can handle multiple versions if a service installed (I might have
  multiple ftpds or in.fingerds on my system)
* allows admins to manually add/remove entries

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@liacs.nl                    http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Attachment: pgpxakC2mcQJT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: