[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: inetd.d proposal



Previously Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo wrote:
> <service_name> <sock_type> <proto> <flags> <user> <server_path> <args>

This is extremely inflexible, and won't allow you to take advantage of
extra features of inetd-replacements such as xinetd and g2s but limits
you to the inetd feature-set.

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@liacs.nl                    http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Attachment: pgpv8WEGoffYX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: