Re: init file questions
On Jun 21, 99 23:30:10 -0400, Jim Knoble wrote:
> The language of `reload' and `force-reload' bothers me a bit. There
> must be a better way of distinguishing between the actions, especially
> if `force-reload' is required (and hence is more likely to be used) and
> `reload' is not (and hence less likely).
>
> How about the following instead:
>
> soft-reload => cause the service to reread its configuration iff
> supported (same as `reload' above)
>
> reload => cause the service to perform `refresh' above if it's
> supported, otherwise perform `restart' (same as
> `force-reload' above).
I like this much more than the other way round.
Regards,
Markus
--
Markus Rex (msrex@suse.de) SuSE GmbH
"To Infinity And Beyond! - I'm sorry, I just couldn't resist!"
- Flic as he mounts a dandelion in "A Bug's Live"
Reply to: