[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: /usr/share/man

Previously John H Terpstra wrote:
> We have gone to a lot of trouble to make the change from /usr/man to
> /usr/share/man because we agree with this move. We do believe that the
> symbolic link from /usr/man to /usr/share/man is a necessity for backwards
> compatibility.

We could say that /usr/share/man is preferred (FHS) but /usr/man should
still work, either as a symlink or a man-configuration that makes man
search both locations.


 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@liacs.nl                    http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Attachment: pgpW1BKozpp5P.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: