[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: /usr/share/man

On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Jim Kingdon wrote:

]As people who were in New York will recall, we (very) briefly
]discussed the subject of /usr/share/man on Friday.  I asked Cristian
]about this today; he said that he had no desire to switch from
]/usr/man to /usr/share/man (if I understood him correctly the
]rationale was that Unix has used /usr/man since time immemorial and
]although there is a certain logic to /usr/share/man there isn't a
]compelling reason to switch).

I more often see /usr/man as a symbolic link to /usr/share/man
for backward compatability.  I've also noticed more and more 
applications using /usr/share for common files.  Personally,
I would vote for /usr/share/man, but I don't think it matters


](feel free to forward this message to fhs-discuss if desired).
]To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-spec-request@lists.linuxbase.org
]with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster@lists.linuxbase.org

Reply to: