[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Testing of lsbdev and sample implementation

Stuart Anderson writes...

> dependence on rsh) is not defined by the LSB. In otherwords, LSB provided
> commands do not themselves have to be LSB conformant. Usualy, it is trivial
> to ensure that they are, but it is not required.

That seems wrong to me, not requiring it sort of taints the whole process. 
IMHO the LSB should at least have the *potential* of standing alone. It 
doesn't today, but that's because not enough is defined to make a working 
system, which is a different issue.

Should it be required that lsb components be lsb conformant?

Matt Taggart        Linux Development Lab
taggart@fc.hp.com   HP Linux Systems Operation

Reply to: