Re: {lsb-discuss} Re: lsb-apache rpms
M. Drew Streib writes:
>
> I think the current spec specifies .rpm though, although I know .lsb has
> been discussed. I assume for lsb 1.0 this can't change...?
>
> Also, the convention of dashes I'm using seems to be the way most people
> do it, although this isn't specified in spec. I prefer it Anthony/Debian's
> way. Does anyone else have thoughts on this?
I don't believe either of the above are specified at all in the main
part of the spec. I agree its a good idea - is someone willing to
provide a patch for the rpm source on freestandards.org
(/pub/lsb/lsbdev) to do this by default?
Chris.
--
cyeoh@au.ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia
Reply to: