Re: man pages
Me <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > LSB's ... mission ... is creation of _Barely Enough_
> > if that is the position of the LSB...
> Perhaps someone active in the LSB will confirm this.
> > > expansion of this mission right now would be highly inappropriate.
> > I disagree on the point of not being allowed to change the [mission]
> > ... because it has been worked on for years. ... not a good argument.
> Agreed, that would be a stupid argument. But that was not my
> argument. First, I was talking about a drastic expansion of the
> mission (adding stuff that the LSB think would be good, rather
> than stuff that is necessary, as dictated solely by either pure
> technical issues, or non-controversial demands by distros and
> ISVs), not a slight change. Second, I was talking about debate
> _right now_. Let them get LSB 1 settled, then consider where
> the LSB goes from there.
Point taken. But I'd like to leave it an open topic for future
development of LSB. And we can't start debating adn discussing it early
enough (as are doing right now :).