Re: File Systems.
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Nicholas Petreley wrote:
> Erik will have to speak for himself as to his motivations, but what he
> described reflects FHS, which is the standard LSB was shooting for. I don't
> know how well Red Hat adheres to FHS off hand, but surely we're not going to
> deliberately steer away from standards that Red Hat endorses or uses just
> for the sake of not being Red Hat?
IM(NSH)O I find that Solaris 2 is propably leader when it comes to being
FHS compliant.
Hugo.
PS: Please reduce the number of email addresses in the To:/Cc: headers.
--
Hugo van der Kooij; Oranje Nassaustraat 16; 3155 VJ Maasland
hvdkooij@caiw.nl http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~hvdkooij/
--------------------------------------------------------------
Use of any of my email addresses for unsollicited (commercial)
email is a clear intrusion of my privacy and illegal!
Reply to: