Re: Logos revisited
Could you post a URL to the logos again?
I like the one with the arrows. Will it have
some text associated with it like "LSB 1.0 compliant"
to indicate the version of LSB and level of
compliance?
Nicholas Petreley wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> It seems as if the logo discussion has petered out. Which
> way do you want to go? Do you want to accept the logo with
> the arrows that most people liked and tweak it? Or do you
> want to run an LSB Logo contest?
>
> If we do the contest I can manage it from my column (issue
> the challenge, and collect the samples). If you agree that
> the one with the arrows is ok, I can ask our artist to
> tweak it. Please vote for your choice here asap.
--
The address in the headers is not the poster's real email address. Do not send
private mail to the poster using your mailer's "reply" feature. CC's of mail
to mailing lists are OK. Problem reports to "postmaster@umail.corel.com".
The poster's email address is "jefft@corel.com".
Reply to: