Re: Packaging and installation
Previously Jeffrey Watts wrote:
> In short, the Debian folks (and everyone else participating in the LSB)
> have long ago agreed on RPM as a standard.
This needs so further comments: what we (at least I) agreed to is that
at the moment rpm is the most common package format, and it makes sense
that if ISVs want to ship software as a package they are best of doing
so as an rpm, and we'll use alien to get it to install on a dpkg based
We have not agreed that rpm is the end-all of package managers or that
we will switch to using rpm.
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| email@example.com http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |