(tclsh vs tcl) Re: #! -- reconsideration?

To: lsb-discuss@lists.linuxbase.org
Subject: (tclsh vs tcl) Re: #! -- reconsideration?
From: "David N. Welton" <davidw@linuxcare.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 11:04:57 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000511110457.W401@linuxcare.com>
Mail-followup-to: lsb-discuss@lists.linuxbase.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3919BCF5.8C5201C3@emc.com>; from sschwarm@emc.com on Wed, May 10, 2000 at 03:48:05PM -0400
References: <[🔎] 200005101203.IAA18835@dad.cs.fsu.edu> <[🔎] 3919BCF5.8C5201C3@emc.com>

On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 03:48:05PM -0400, Stephen Schwarm wrote:

> #!posix_shell -c tcl
> 
> and the "correct" path would be used to find tcl

As per the bug report I submitted to the sourceforge LSB site, I
wanted to correct this.  The Tcl binary has always been called
"tclsh", not "tcl".

Thanks,
-- 
David N. Welton, Responsabile Progetti Open Source, Linuxcare Italia spa
tel +39.049.8043411 fax +39.049.8043412 cel +39.348.2879508
davidw@linuxcare.com, http://www.linuxcare.com/
Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: (tclsh vs tcl) Re: #! -- reconsideration?
  - From: "John W. Lockhart" <lockhart@oco.net>

References:
- Re: #! -- reconsideration?
  - From: Ted Baker <baker@dad.cs.fsu.edu>
- Re: #! -- reconsideration?
  - From: Stephen Schwarm <sschwarm@emc.com>

Prev by Date: Re: #! -- reconsideration?
Next by Date: Re: #! -- reconsideration?
Previous by thread: Re: #! -- reconsideration?
Next by thread: Re: (tclsh vs tcl) Re: #! -- reconsideration?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread