[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: itype 3 as generic status Re: To evolve or not to evolve

It was thus said that the Great Mateusz Viste once stated:
> Such approach would prevent using the "3" line for redirecting the user 
> somewhere else, but maybe it's for the best, because a "3" line is not 
> supposed to be selectable in the first place, 

  Where is this documented?  I can't find anything about error handling at
all in RFC-1436, exccept to document that type '3' is an error.  Nothing
about what a server should return in case of an error.


Reply to: