Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Eugene V. Lyubimkin (jackyf.devel@gmail.com): > >> Hello Christian! We need to re-upload apt anyway because it was some >> upload/build problem with 0.7.17 upload (as 0.7.17.1?). So reverting is >> possible. And if you will run a call for translations, please wait for next >> upload, we have bugfixes that touch translationable messages (Michael, can you >> include those two ones by yourself in this case?). > > > Are they really necessary ? > > Breaking APT translations so close to the release is *really* > disappointing for translators who made a big effort to achieve > completeness before the recent bump in APT development happened. > > Please note that I talk about changes targeted for lenny. So, I'd > expect that no new features are added and therefore no new messages. > > If there are typo corrections, please coordinate with me. Typo > corrections have to be handled specifically as they don't require > changes to translations which can be unfuzzied (but this is a process > I will never leave to non i18n people). > > Again, please refrain from gratuitous changes to i18n'ed > strings. lowering down the translation statistics is highly > demotivating for translators. > > All my previous sentence takes sense _only if_ you will call for new translations. Otherwise - they stay out of Lenny. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature