Re: apt https method v2
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> > Didn't you already answer this email?
> Actually, no :-)))
Surely <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.32.0204061008040.308-100000@localhost> ?
> > unclearly defined purposes, etc, etc - BUT taken together I belive it
> > represents the lowest LOC and has a good level of understandability.
> Well:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 tpo tpo 11045 Apr 3 12:45 apt_0.5.4-0.1.diff.gz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 tpo tpo 15455 Apr 9 00:19 apt_0.5.4-0.2.diff.gz
Yes - but, .1 has all those #ifdefs which are a bad way to save LOC..
> I got an idea how to implement the select mess and it would be nice to do
> it in an efficient way. We'll see.
Well, be careful, the select bit is not that long and it is the core of
the data transfer. Things like the relative order of the FD checks are
actually important and should be kept clear.
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deity-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: