Re: tar.gz
On Mon, 18 May 1998, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> Scott,
>
> The source tar.gz still doesn't have everything in it. I should be able to
> unpack it on my 486 and run debian/rules build, I should not need libtool,
> automake, autoconf or any of those other evil things (nor can I with this
> bo system)
>
> You should run debian/rules Makefile.in and then fix the symlinks before
> you build the tar.gz
>
> Some of the things that must be in the tar (and not as symlinks) are
> configure
> */Makefile.in
> intl/
>
> Again, I'd rather not have the things in CVS you put in, and I really
> don't want all the Makefile.in's in CVS, I'd hope the packaging system is
> flexable enough to let us do this :|
I've been forgetting what I created the super-l33ch target for :/
I'll try to remember to run "debian/rules super-l33ch" before building
from now on :)
--
Scott K. Ellis | I don't explain myself.
<ellis@valueweb.net> | My friends understand
ValueWeb Hosting Services | and the rest wouldn't
http://www.valueweb.net/ | believe me anyway.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deity-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tar.gz
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>
- References:
- tar.gz
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>