[Pkg-xfce-devel] Consensus on Maintainer: and Uploader: fields?

[alexander@schmehl.info (Alexander Schmehl)]

--da9oBGf5DLtF9ehv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Rudy Godoy <rudy@kernel-panik.org> [050128 21:12]:
> > >  I prefer the second.  There's no real reason any one person should h=
ave
> > >  more ownership over particular packages than any others.
> > I prefer the second too.
> Same here.

I agree (and am quite busy currently, sorry.)

Yours sincerely,
  Alexander

--=20
http://learn.to/quote/
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

--da9oBGf5DLtF9ehv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB+q9BiSG13M0VqIMRAt3BAJ9PG+nxymemArPtltzMSk5FQofbuACfZqT0
892jFFsSZ6H/jvIslc8K1tY=
=cGV8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--da9oBGf5DLtF9ehv--