[Pkg-xfce-devel] Consensus on Maintainer: and Uploader: fields?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 03:49:24PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
> Before we go uploading anything, I'd like a consensus on how we will
> go about setting the Maintainer/Uploaders fields for our packages.
> There are two styles:
> Maintainer: Andrew Lau <netsnipe@...>
> Uploaders: Debian Xfce Maintainers
> <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Alexander Schmehl
> <tolimar-guest@...>, Emanuele Rocca <ema@...>
> Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers <email@example.com=
> Uploaders: Alexander Schmehl <tolimar-guest@...>,
> Andrew Lau <netsnipe@...>. Emanuele Rocca <ema@...>
> Choose one and I'll edit the scripts I wrote for gnome-pkg-tools for a
> new xfce-pkg-tools package. Don't forget that there's always the PTS for
> forwarding bug reports to the list.
I prefer the second. There's no real reason any one person should have
more ownership over particular packages than any others.
I need to talk to madkiss about the main packages but I imagine they'll
go the same way even if they don't end up using cdbs.
_| - Oh no. It's closed. |_
| - We're not pre-school toys Slinky; we can read. |
`- http://www.earth.li/~huggie/ - http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/ -'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----