[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-xfce-devel] Consensus on Maintainer: and Uploader: fields?



--JbKQpFqZXJ2T76Sg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 03:49:24PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
> Before we go uploading anything, I'd like a consensus on how we will
> go about setting the Maintainer/Uploaders fields for our packages.
> There are two styles:

> Maintainer: Andrew Lau <netsnipe@...>
> Uploaders: Debian Xfce Maintainers
> 	<pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Alexander Schmehl
> 	<tolimar-guest@...>, Emanuele Rocca <ema@...>

> OR:

> Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers <pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.debian.o=
rg>
> Uploaders: Alexander Schmehl <tolimar-guest@...>,
> 	Andrew Lau <netsnipe@...>. Emanuele Rocca <ema@...>

> Choose one and I'll edit the scripts I wrote for gnome-pkg-tools for a
> new xfce-pkg-tools package. Don't forget that there's always the PTS for
> forwarding bug reports to the list.

I prefer the second.  There's no real reason any one person should have
more ownership over particular packages than any others.

I need to talk to madkiss about the main packages but I imagine they'll
go the same way even if they don't end up using cdbs.

--=20
 ,--huggie-at-earth-dot-li--------stuff-thing-stuff----------DF5CE2B4--.
_|                       - Oh no.  It's closed.                        |_
 |          - We're not pre-school toys Slinky; we can read.           |
 `- http://www.earth.li/~huggie/ - http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/ -'

--JbKQpFqZXJ2T76Sg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB+gUvMQdl+99c4rQRAspuAJ0e5z7SPUQXbwQzoigrowTIFryrEgCdEEAY
ipGRhBUFVLwkAsKTxRTXnhM=
=bi7R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--JbKQpFqZXJ2T76Sg--




Reply to: