[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-xfce-devel] Consensus on Maintainer: and Uploader: fields?



* [ 28-01-05 - 10:26 ] Simon Huggins <huggie@earth.li> wrote:=20
>  On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 03:49:24PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
>  > Before we go uploading anything, I'd like a consensus on how we will
>  > go about setting the Maintainer/Uploaders fields for our packages.
>  > There are two styles:
> =20
>  > Maintainer: Andrew Lau <netsnipe@...>
>  > Uploaders: Debian Xfce Maintainers
>  > 	<pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Alexander Schmehl
>  > 	<tolimar-guest@...>, Emanuele Rocca <ema@...>
> =20
>  > ORe:
> =20
>  > Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers <pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.debia=
n.org>
>  > Uploaders: Alexander Schmehl <tolimar-guest@...>,
>  > 	Andrew Lau <netsnipe@...>. Emanuele Rocca <ema@...>
> =20
>  > Choose one and I'll edit the scripts I wrote for gnome-pkg-tools for a
>  > new xfce-pkg-tools package. Don't forget that there's always the PTS f=
or
>  > forwarding bug reports to the list.
> =20
>  I prefer the second.  There's no real reason any one person should have
>  more ownership over particular packages than any others.

I prefer the second too.

ciao,=09
	ema




Reply to: