Re: libdrm package
2014-07-30 12:08 GMT+02:00 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>:
> op 30-07-14 12:04, Pedretti Fabio schreef:
>> 2014-07-29 15:24 GMT+02:00 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>:
>>> op 29-07-14 15:17, Pedretti Fabio schreef:
>>>> Hi, this two commits:
>>>> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-xorg/lib/libdrm.git/commit/?id=99f0810d7b83a1a7eb07a1dfe61dd130a3e572f0
>>>> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-xorg/lib/libdrm.git/commit/?id=e0ecbaa110adda9805f55482f67544d755720161
>>>>
>>>> refers in the new exynos and freedreno packages to the
>>>> "omap-specific", it looks missing an update after copy-paste from
>>>> another package.
>>>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> Thanks for catching it!
>>
>> After latest commits there still is some inconsistencies, e.g., some
>> packages (freedreno, exynos) have this description for both the
>> library and -dbg version:
>>
>> This library implements the userspace interface to the kernel DRM services.
>> DRM stands for "Direct Rendering Manager", which is the kernelspace portion
>> of the "Direct Rendering Infrastructure" (DRI). The DRI is currently used on
>> Linux to provide hardware-accelerated OpenGL drivers.
>>
>> All others has a specific description, e.g. intel:
>>
>> This library implements the userspace interface to the intel-specific kernel
>> DRM services. DRM stands for "Direct Rendering Manager", which is the
>> kernelspace portion of the "Direct Rendering Infrastructure" (DRI). The DRI is
>> currently used on Linux to provide hardware-accelerated OpenGL drivers.
>>
>> while the -dbg package has a different, not specific description.
>>
>> Not a big issue anyway...
>>
> Yeah on purpose, it's a bit unclear to me what freedreno requires, seems to be a mix of KGSL and msm kernel services,
> so I used the generic description from the -dbg package, and only have it mentioned in the first description line.
I was referring to the long description. I'll send a patch to cleanup.
Reply to: