[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libdrm package



op 30-07-14 12:04, Pedretti Fabio schreef:
> 2014-07-29 15:24 GMT+02:00 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>:
>> op 29-07-14 15:17, Pedretti Fabio schreef:
>>> Hi, this two commits:
>>> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-xorg/lib/libdrm.git/commit/?id=99f0810d7b83a1a7eb07a1dfe61dd130a3e572f0
>>> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-xorg/lib/libdrm.git/commit/?id=e0ecbaa110adda9805f55482f67544d755720161
>>>
>>> refers in the new exynos and freedreno packages to the
>>> "omap-specific", it looks missing an update after copy-paste from
>>> another package.
>>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> Thanks for catching it!
>
> After latest commits there still is some inconsistencies, e.g., some
> packages (freedreno, exynos) have this description for both the
> library and -dbg version:
>
>  This library implements the userspace interface to the kernel DRM services.
>  DRM stands for "Direct Rendering Manager", which is the kernelspace portion
>  of the "Direct Rendering Infrastructure" (DRI). The DRI is currently used on
>  Linux to provide hardware-accelerated OpenGL drivers.
>
> All others has a specific description, e.g. intel:
>
> This library implements the userspace interface to the intel-specific kernel
>  DRM services.  DRM stands for "Direct Rendering Manager", which is the
>  kernelspace portion of the "Direct Rendering Infrastructure" (DRI). The DRI is
>  currently used on Linux to provide hardware-accelerated OpenGL drivers.
>
> while the -dbg package has a different, not specific description.
>
> Not a big issue anyway...
>
Yeah on purpose, it's a bit unclear to me what freedreno requires, seems to be a mix of KGSL and msm kernel services,
so I used the generic description from the -dbg package, and only have it mentioned in the first description line.

~Maarten


Reply to: