[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#601434: closed by Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> (Re: Bug#601434: xorg kernel modesetting req in sid)



I checked out the links you sent, but I don't understand why, if it
worked previously, UMS is being removed as an option now.  The thing
is, I have to mess with it more, but I think KMS may work partly with
2.6.30 or 32 but I'm not sure.  When I saw the update, I decided I
should update my kernel to see if that helped.  On 2.6.36, I get a
black screen on boot with KMS!

Could you maybe explain to me more technically why UMS is being
removed?  I think I have an Intel GMA 950.

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System
<owner@bugs.debian.org> wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the xserver-xorg package:
>
> #601434: xorg kernel modesetting req in sid
>
> It has been closed by Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>.
>
> Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
> If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
> better one in a separate message then please contact Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> by
> replying to this email.
>
>
> --
> 601434: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601434
> Debian Bug Tracking System
> Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
> To: Peter <necedemalis@gmail.com>, 601434-done@bugs.debian.org
> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:40:24 +0200
> Subject: Re: Bug#601434: xorg kernel modesetting req in sid
> Hi Peter.
>
> Peter <necedemalis@gmail.com> (26/10/2010):
>> Recently X was updated so that something requires kernel
>> modesetting: (EE) intel(0): No kernel modesetting driver detected.
>>
>> My thinkpad x60 has problems with kernel modesetting so I cannot use
>> it.
>
> Then file bugs so that problems get fixed. Alternatively, if you've
> got an i8xx card, try fbdev or vesa.
>
>> I would like to request that modesetting be made an option in
>> xorg.conf instead of a requirement, or removed entirely.  If it is
>> an option already, then I apologize but I don't know what that
>> option is.
>
> That's no longer an option for intel. I've blogged several times about
> it, describing what we tried. You can read more on that topic on:
>  http://blog.ikibiki.org/2010/07/04/We_need_you_redux/
>  http://blog.ikibiki.org/2010/10/02/October-X-update/
>
> Closing as not a bug, we have no means of supporting UMS for intel
> anymore.
>
> Mraw,
> KiBi.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkzGd9UACgkQeGfVPHR5Nd2dkwCgmHC7dsL6OKrfrFsMLj/95xCg
> qZ0AoNBsTn8IohgzBu1KwLZ2h2PsPMHW
> =JxGf
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Peter <necedemalis@gmail.com>
> To: submit@bugs.debian.org
> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:09:22 -0400
> Subject: xorg kernel modesetting req in sid
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: unstable
>
> Recently X was updated so that something requires kernel modesetting:
> (EE) intel(0): No kernel modesetting driver detected.
>
> My thinkpad x60 has problems with kernel modesetting so I cannot use
> it.  This is with a recent kernel.  This is frustrating for me since X
> has started up fine for a while.  I would like to request that
> modesetting be made an option in xorg.conf instead of a requirement,
> or removed entirely.  If it is an option already, then I apologize but
> I don't know what that option is.
>
>
>
>



Reply to: