Bug#489051: Possible patch to solve unresolved symbol
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 10:31:25 +0200, mariodebian wrote:
> I'm inspired in this commit in xorg last Febrary:
> As you see (search GTFMode) the patch when Xorg developers add
> xf86GTFMode is very similar to mine, in old versions only use CVTMode.
with the following description:
CVT is enough different from GTF that it should not be used on monitors
that aren't expecting it. This brings us closer to what the spec says
the correct behaviour is.
So using CVT when we want GTF doesn't seem right (I haven't actually
looked at what the vesa driver used to do, so I need to check that).