El sáb, 05-07-2008 a las 09:43 +0200, Julien Cristau escribió: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 20:19:10 +0200, mariodebian wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > I have made a small patch to solve this bug. > > > > I'm very newbie in this things excuse me if this patch isn't necesary... > > > > I don't know exactly from which version of Xorg this patch applies > > > > #if XORG_VERSION_MAJOR > 1 && XORG_VERSION_MINOR >= 4 && > > XORG_VERSION_PATCH > 2 > > this is wrong, it won't work if XORG_VERSION_MAJOR is 2 and _MINOR is < > 4. needs a comparison between XORG_VERSION_CURRENT and > XORG_VERSION_NUMERIC(1,4,99,something). You are true, with my patch Xorg < 2 always use CVTMode, and this is not my intention.... > > > mode = xf86GTFMode(p->HDisplay, p->VDisplay, v, 0, 0); > > #else > > mode = xf86CVTMode(p->HDisplay, p->VDisplay, v, FALSE, FALSE); > > #endif > > > and I'm not too confident about this, because cvt and gtf modes can't be > used interchangeably (monitors don't necessarily support both, aiui). > I'm inspired in this commit in xorg last Febrary: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-commit/2008-February/014985.html As you see (search GTFMode) the patch when Xorg developers add xf86GTFMode is very similar to mine, in old versions only use CVTMode. > Cheers, > Julien Greetings -- http://soleup.eup.uva.es/mariodebian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente