Brice Goglin a écrit :
BERTRAND Joël wrote:Yes, I have. Configuration : SS20 with dual SM71, 2.6.22-rc7 smp kernel (with only one SMP related bug on sparc32 ;-) ), CG14 (1280x1024@76), debian/testing up to date. 1/ X works fine (but I have to add /dev/tty0 in udev configuration script because udev does'nt create tty0 !) with xfs ; 2/ gdm does not run (same bug than sparc64, XineramaIsActive always returns True even if Xinerama is not active).So, if I understand correctly, #399862 can be closed
Yes, #399862 can be closed. I have token some time to test because 2.6 kernels are not stable on sparc32 (even without SMP due to a lack in ESP SCSI driver)...
while #431746 occurs on multiple machines?
I have tested some configurations to isolate parameters :1/ sparc32/smp SS20 + CG14 -> bug (I haven't tested with CG6 because my test workstation has no empty Sbus). I have a ZX framebuffer (leo) in a SS5, but ZX framebuffer support is totaly broken in 2.6.x kernels;
2/ sparc64/smp U60 (UPA/PCI) + Creator3D -> bug; 3/ sparc64/smp U2 (UPA/Sbus) + Creator3D -> bug; 4/ i386 + prosavage8 -> no bug; 5/ i386 + Radeon Mobility 9200 (AGP) -> no bug. All configurations are up to date (debian testing).I don't know if this bug is sparc32/64 specific, but I only see this bug on sparc32 and sparc64, never on i386.
Regards, JKB