[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#362920: Bug#362884: Bug#362920: cvs - X11R7.0 incompatibilities



On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:17:28AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 19:24 +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 07:17:40PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:24:21AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > > Painfully, we may have to proceed without freetype support in Xprint
> > > > after all.
> > > 
> > > AIUI, the non-freeness issue I raised on xorg-modular, would certainly
> > > violate the DFSG?
> 
> I missed your message at xorg-modular, when did you make it?

I looked and couldn't find it.  Which is odd.  I probably sent it from
the wrong address, so it got bounced.

> > For reference, the upstream copyright file:
> > http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/xorg/xc/extras/ttf2pt1/COPYRIGHT?view=markup
> > 
> > I misremembered (confusing it with the stupid libXaw copyright issue):
> > it's not actually DFSG-non-free, but just GPL-incompatible IIRC --
> > advertising clause.  
> 
> Yes, that's right, just the advertising clause.  My guess is they
> generically grabbed the BSD licence at the time. A nice solution would
> be if ttf2pt1 changed their licence to modern BSD.  I might ask them.

That would be great.

> > Though the Type1 assembler is one of those
> > 'licences are easy, I'll just write one myself' types. :\
> > 
> 
> Cool! Thanks for volunteering to do it ;)

Heh.

> > > This will all clear up much more easily once Debian has upgraded to
> > > X11R7.1.
> > 
> > Right.  Given they're modules, an upload of just the newer versions of
> > x11proto-fixes and libxfont could be done?  This is, after all, the
> > Grand Unified New Modular Reality. :)
> 
> It'd be nice if that's true, and it would make sense.  Older xserver
> code simply wouldn't use the two new xfixes functions.  However someone
> at #xorg said he wasn't sure it was that simple, and that it might
> destabilise the system.  I can't judge whether he is being overly
> pessimistic or not.
> 
> I'm all for uploading the newer Fixes and Font if it's safe to do so.

He's just being overly pessimistic.  It's fine.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: