On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 07:17:40PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:24:21AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > > Painfully, we may have to proceed without freetype support in Xprint > > after all. > > AIUI, the non-freeness issue I raised on xorg-modular, would certainly > violate the DFSG? For reference, the upstream copyright file: http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/xorg/xc/extras/ttf2pt1/COPYRIGHT?view=markup I misremembered (confusing it with the stupid libXaw copyright issue): it's not actually DFSG-non-free, but just GPL-incompatible IIRC -- advertising clause. Though the Type1 assembler is one of those 'licences are easy, I'll just write one myself' types. :\ Cheers, Daniel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature