Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r1051 - tags
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 03:44 +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > I agree that a Mesa upload is overdue (anybody heard anything from
> > Marcelo?), but I still don't like the package naming as currently in
> > xorg SVN. I think something like libgl1-mesa-(sw)x11 would be more
> > accurate than libgl1-mesa-swrast, but I absolutely don't see the point
> > of going through the pain of renaming libgl1-mesa-dri to libgl1-mesa, as
> > the former is more accurate.
>
> +1 on moving libgl1-mesa-swrast to libgl1-mesa-swx11.
Cool, and thanks to David who already changed it.
> As for -dri and -mesa, the only reason why that happened is because I
> already had libgl1-mesa for the library and libgl1-mesa-dri for the
> modules in my tree before Marcelo did 6.4.x. To be honest, I don't
> care either way.
I see. Keeping the DRI drivers in their own package would probably be
nice, how about libgl1-mesa-glx for libGL and libgl1-mesa-dri for the
drivers?
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
Reply to: